Population Dynamics of Different Mosquito Species at Lahore College For Women University Campus, Lahore  

Farkhanda Manzoor , Aniqa Nasir , Sabiha Fazal
Department of Zoology, Lahore College For Women University, Lahore, Pakistan
Author    Correspondence author
Journal of Mosquito Research, 2013, Vol. 3, No. 12   doi: 10.5376/jmr.2013.03.0012
Received: 19 May, 2013    Accepted: 03 Jun., 2013    Published: 30 Jul., 2013
© 2013 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

Farkhanda Manzoor et al., 2013, Population Dynamics of Different Mosquito Species at Lahore College For Women University Campus, Lahore, Journal of Mosquito Research, Vol.3, No.11 82-88 (doi: 10.5376/jmr.2013.03.0011)

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate and identify the different species of mosquitoes found at LCWU campus and to demonstrate the population dynamics and seasonal fluctuations in the breeding peaks of mosquitoes. The species captured were Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles subpictus. These species were found at the suitable breeding sites of LCWU where the seeping, drainage and dampness were present. Bamboo traps were used for capturing the larvae of different mosquitoes. Their population dynamics was strongly related to seasonal temperature. The highest density of Aedes sp. was found in the month of April and lowest was found in the months of December and January, the highest density of Culex sp. was found also in the month of April and lowest was found in December and January and the highest density of Anopheles spp. was found in the month of February and lowest was found in the months of December and January. The abundance was co-related with the seasonal temperature which shows the positive co-relation with Aedes and Culex sp. and negative co-relation with Anopheles spp.

Keywords
Mosquito; Aedes aegypti; Culex quinquefasciatus; Anopheles stephensi; Anopheles subpictus; Population dynamics; Bamboo traps

Introduction
Mosquitoes belong to the order Diptera and family Culicidae. They differ in their habitats which vary from species to species and also in the mode or time of biting. Only female mosquito sucks the blood which is required for its oviposition (WHO, 2005).

The period of development from egg to adult varies among species and is strongly influenced by ambient temperature. Some species of mosquitoes can develop from egg to adult in as little as five days, but a more typical period of development in tropical conditions would be some 40 days or more for most species (Vujic et al., 2010).

The seasonal variations directly affect the growth, development and activiteis of Aedes mosquitoes. In cooler climates Aedes develop in a week upto a month. It can remain in the larval stage for a month as long as water supply remains constant (Foster and Walker, 2002). In Thailand a study on the seasonal basis was conducted in dry and wet season respectively. In wet season the larval indices found to be greater as compared to the dry season (Preechaporn et al., 2007). The dynamics of seasonal population of Aedes mosquito was related to climatic factors as well as human activities in France (Poncon et al., 2007). In Serbia the results showed the highest number of mosquitoes was captured in May, June and July respectively (Vujic et al., 2010). A layer traps method was adopted to collect different mosquito species from August 2003 to June 2004. Aedes species was collected at the density of 12 eggs/layer trap/month. It was highest in rainy season that was a long period from April to July and a short is about from August to September. The mean annual temperature was 28℃ with an annual relative humidity averaging between 80% to 90% (Coulibaly et al., 2010). The adult female could lay upto 300~400 eggs during her life time (Matre-Pierre, 2006). The eggs of Aedes are desiccation resistant; this factor is of great entomological consideration because even during the dry season the eggs remain viable. Aedes species is very much susceptible to the climatic factors and seasonal variation. Some models and analysis had been represented to show the global scale association between climatic factors and development, potential distribution and population dynamics of Aedes mosquitoes (Hopp et al., 2001).

Culex quinquefasciatus is a major vector of lymphatic filariasis in Pakistan as well as in India (Jahan and Hussain, 2011). High population explosion of this species in Lahore District has become a severe biting nuisance primarily in summer months (Tahir et al., 2009). Weather pattern affects the adult female mosquito abundance by changing the quality and quantity of larval habits. The relationship between climatic variables and mosquito abundance can provide important information to determine virus activity levels and therefore disease risks (Wegbreit and Reisen, 2000). The Culex quinquefasciatus peaked during the winter months and in spring. Its egg rafts were found in a woody area. The population increased during March due to availability of favourable breeding sites containing stagnant water polluted with decayed organic matter. The species is most common in paddy fields and is related to the rice cultivation in India (Kanojia et al., 2003). Ovitraps were used in the summers of 2002 and 2003 to measure the oviposition activity of Culex mosquito. Oviposition pattern was similar in both years. It was highest in late June and the middle of July showed a steady decline throughout the remainder of each season (Jackson, 2004). An increase was observed in the population dynamics of all the mosquito species in the July-September period (Aldemir, 2004). Environmental temperature can also affect the ability of mosquitoes to transmit West Nile Virus (WNV) and an arbovirus (Dohm et al., 2002). For all the species of Culex population increased earlier and declined later in drier, warmer, Southern regions in California, these patterns may be driven by temperature (Barker et al., 2010).

Anopheles stephensi is the major cause of transmitting malaria not only in the Indian subcontinent but also in Iran and in middle east. Pakistan is facing the burden of about 1.6 million malarial cases annually. Anopheles stephensi transmits the plasmidium as an urban vector (The NEWS, 2012). Anopheles stephensi has increased in prevalence and became more common. This shift in species dominance may be due to the large-scale ecological changes that have taken place in the Punjab, where irrigation-induced waterlogging of soil with related salinization has created an environment favourable for the more salt-tolerant A. stephensi (Klinkenberg et al., 2004). A study was carried out from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000 in Lahore, Pakistan. Mosquitoes were collected from bedrooms using the pyrethroid spraycatch method and from vegetation and animal sheds using backpack aspirators An. subpictus populations peaked in August, September and October. High temperatures and low rainfall negatively affected seasonal abundance in our area. Our observations indicate that, in South Punjab, irrigation-related sites support the breeding of Anopheline mosquitoes, including the vectors of malaria (Herrel et al., 2004).

Present study was conducted out to: Identify all the species of mosquitoes found at the LCWU, Lahore campus; Locate the breeding sites for the mosquitoes in the university; Determine their population dynamics in different seasons; Co-relate their growth rate with the seasonal temperature.

Investigate the seasonal peaks for the growth of mosquitoes so that preventive measures could be adopted.

1 Results
Monthly Table of Mean values of Mosquitoes (Table 1~3).

 

 

Table 1 Monthly reading per trap

 

 

Table 2 Showing monthly the minimum and maximum temperature of Lahore

 

 

Table 3 Correlation coefficient (r) between different mosquito genera and mean maximum daily temperature


The analysis of variance of different mosquito genera collected in the month of October, 2011, revealed significant difference (F=6.27; df=2, 8; P<0.05). The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera is presented in the Table 4. The results revealed that Aedes sp. (73.400) and Culex sp. (93.600) genera were the most prevalent, both were statistically at par, followed by genus Anopheles spp. (18.600). The analysis of variance of different mosquito genera collected in the month of November, 2011, revealed non- significant difference (F=1.41; df=2, 8; P>0.05). The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera is presented in the Table 4. In the month of December and January, no population of mosquitoes was found in the campus. The analysis of variance of different mosquito genera collected in the month of February 2012 revealed non-significant difference (F=1.98; df=2, 8; P>0.05). The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera is presented in the Table 4. The analysis of variance of different mosquito genera collected in the month of March 2012, revealed significant difference (F=11.97; df=2, 8; P<0.01). The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera is presented in the Table 4, the results revealed that Aedes (877.60) and Culex (781.80) genera were the most prevalent, both were statistically at par, followed by genus Anopheles (474.60). The analysis of variance of different mosquito genera collected in the month of April 2012 revealed significant difference (F=66.32; df=2, 8; P<0.01). The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera is presented in the Table 4, the results revealed that Aedes (1151.0) and Culex (858.25) genera were the most prevalent; both were statistically at par, followed by genus Anopheles. The analysis of variance of different mosquito genera collected in the month of May 2012 revealed significant difference (F=94.73; df=2, 8; P<0.01). The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera is presented in the Table 4. The results revealed that Aedes (418.20) and Culex (343.70) genera were the most prevalent, both were statistically at par, followed by genus Anopheles.

 

 

Table 4 The mean comparison test (LSD) for different mosquito genera


Discussion
Present study indicates that different species of mosquitoes were present in LCWU campus including 3 genera of Aedes, Culex and Anopheles and species captured were Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles subpictus. These species were related to the suitable breeding sites of LCWU where the seeping, drainage and dampness were present. Bamboo traps proved quite useful in capturing the larvae of different mosquitoes. The highest number of mosquitoes was found in the month of May because of suitable temperature and breeding environment. A highly significant difference was noted in these three genera in the month of March, April and May (P<0.05). So all these genera were abundant in these months due to favourable temperature.

The available data provides the seasonal fluctuations of the population dynamics of different mosquitoes. Statistical analysis reveals that the population of the genera of Aedes and Culex increases with temperature and of the population of Anopheles decreases. The hieghest density of Anopheles was found in the month of February. This study indicates the peak time of rising of the mosquitoes so that the proper precautionary measures can be taken before any outbreak of epidemic like DF or DHF. It is very important to know about the mosquito’s habit and seasonal abundance to control it properly.

Studies on the seasonal fluctuation of Aedes aegypti were undertaken in different localities of Delhi, during 2000. The Aedes aegypti population was found to be prevalent in all the localities in Delhi. Water coolers and tires were found to be the preferred breeding habitats of Aedes mosquitos in the city. Aedes aegypti, being hygroscopic, showed a phenomenon of annual pulsation. It tends to move to mother foci in the central areas of the city, which are humid in the dry season, and spread out during the wet season. Out of 103 778 houses surveyed, 20 513 houses and 3 547 containers were reported positive for Aedes aegypti. The house container and larval indices were very high during the post-monsoon season (Sharma et al., 2000). According to our study the rich abundance of Aedes aegypti was found in the months of March, April and May in LCWU, Lahore Campus. It is probably due to the suitable temperature for the breeding of mosquitoes. A spray named as K-Othrine EC15 was also applied in the Campus on 17th May, so no mosquito larvae was found till the last week of May. The study showed that the highest densities of Ae. aegypti were recorded in the short dry season in Yopougon and Cocody, and at the beginning of the long rainy season in Adjamé and Treichville in the Gulf of Guinea. The lowest densities were recorded during the long dry season (from January to February) in all the five study sites (Coulibaly et al., 2010). We also record the lowest densities in the month of January to February. Even we found some of the population at the last week of February. Because the temperature in these months was about (12~14)℃ and it was not appropriate for the larval growth.

In an investigation, the highest density was observed from the rural areas of east and west Godaveri Districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. The highest density of Culex quinquefasciatus was found in September, October, December; the lowest were recorded in the months of April, May and June. High density of Culex is due to the presenceof big drains and cesspits in the villages: these are the breeding places chosen by Cx. quinquefasciatus (Murty et al., 2002). We recorded the maximum density of Cx. quinquefasciatus in February to May and the minimum was recorded in the months of December and January due to the low temperature. It was due the factor of hygienic conditions as well because in the Campus no water of rain was accumulated as in the fields or the rural areas of Godaveri Districts of Andhra Pradesh.

In Iraq a parasitological survey in 2002 identified no malaria cases but an entomological survey found Anopheles stephensi in high densities. The highest density was recorded in September and the lowest in December and January. A. stephensi adults were present during all months of the year except January, whereas. The highest number is both A. stephensi. The larval stages of A. stephensi disappeared in December and January when the mean temperature was below 14℃. Two peaks of the Anopheles larvae were seen: the first in June and the second in October (Ghoury et al., 2006). In our study we found the heighest density of Anopheles spp. In the month of February where the mean ambiant temperature was about 14.3℃. The results are in accordance with the study performed by Ghoury. Anopheles stephensi start building populations by end March, reaching a peak in April and May and thereafter start falling off rapidly till July. It is found in moderate numbers from September to November. In NWFP, Baluchistan this species is more prominent from July to September (Country Report Pakistan, 2003). The difference of population peaks of mosquitoes even in Pakistan is due to regional climatic changes, inadiquate sanitary conditions and rapid urbanization.

Materials and Methods
Material required

Bamboo traps half filled with water, rearing trays, dropper, convex lens, filter papers, paper cups and microscope.

Methodology
The 50 bamboo traps half filled with tap water were installed at LCWU campus. These traps were placed on different rich breeding sites of the mosquitoes because of being humid and shady. The sites were coded as A, B, C, D, E. Every site consisted of 10 traps. Weekly reading was taken from these traps and the samples were collected in paper cups carefully. The samples were then taken to the laboratory for identification, isolation and quantification of different mosquito species.

References
Aldemir A., and Bosgelmez A., 2006, Population dynamics of adults and immature stages of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Gölbaşı District, Ankara, Turkish journel of Zoology, 30(1): 9-17

Al-Ghoury A.A., El-Hashimi W.K., and Abul-Hab J., 2006, Epidemiology of malaria and predictions of retransmission in Babylon government, Iraq, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 12(3-4): 270-279
PMid:17037694

Barker C.M., Eldridge B.F., and Reisen W.K., 2010, Seasonal abundance of Culex tarsalis and Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in California, Journal of Medical Entomology, 47(5): 759-768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ME09139 PMid:20939368 PMCid:PMC2965637

Bolling J.B., Kennedy, J.H., and Zimmerman E.G., 2005, Seasonal dynamics of four potential West Nile vector species in north-central Texas, Journal of Vector Ecology, 30(2):186-194
PMid:16599151

Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007, CDC answer your question about St. Louise encephalitis, http://www.cdc.gov/sle/

Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002, Provisional surveillance summary of the West Nile virus epidemic, http://www.cdc.gov

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007, Protect yourself from mosquito bites and dengue, http://www.cdc.gov

Chandra G., Bhattacharjee I., and Chatterjee J., 2010, A review on Anopheles subpictus Grassi--A biological vector, Acta Tropica, 115(1-2): 142-154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.02.005 PMid:20153284

Coulibaly G.N., Adja, M.A., Koudou, B.G., Konan, Lucien Y., Diallo M., Kone, A.B., Herve J.P., and Goran K.E., 2010, Distribution and seasonal variation of Aedes aegypti in the health district of Abidjan (Cote d’Ivoire), European Journel of Sceientific Research, 40(4): 522-530

Country Report, 2003, Vector borne diseases in Pakistan, Inter-Country Workshop on developing a regional strategy for integrated vector management for malaria and other vector-borne diseases, Khartoum, Sudan: Directorate of Malaria Control, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, January 21-23

Darsie R.F., and Morris C.D., eds., 2000, Keys to the adult females and fourth-instar larvae of the mosquitoes of Florida (Diptera: Culicidae), In: Technical Bulletin of the Florida Mosquito Control Association, University of Florida, Vero Beach, Florida pp.148-155

Darsie Jr. R.F., and Ward R.A., eds., 2005, Identification and Geographical Distribution of the Mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico, University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida
PMid:16033112

Depinay J.M., Mbogo C.M., Killeen G., Knols B., Beier J., Carlson J., Dushoff J., Billingsley P., Mwambi H., Githure J., Toure A.M., and McKenzie F.E., 2004, A simulation model of African Anopheles ecology and population dynamics for the analysis of malarial transmission, Malaria Journal, 3: 29
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-29 PMid:15285781 PMCid:PMC514565

Dohm D.J., O’Guinnb M.L., and Turell M.J., 2002, Effect of environmental temperature on the ability of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit West Nile virus, Journal of Medical Entomology, 39(1): 221-225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.221  PMid:11931261

Foster W.A and Walker E.D., 2002, Mosquitoes (Culicidae), In: Medical and Veternary Entomology, Mullen G.R., and Durden L.A., eds., Academic press, San Diego, California

Gubler D.J., and Clark G.G., 1995, Dengue/Dengue hemorrhagic fever: the emergence of a global health problem, Eemerging Infectious Diseases, 1(2): 55-57
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0102.950204  PMid:8903160 PMCid:PMC2626838

Gullan P.J., and Cranston P.S., 2004, The Insects: An outline of entomology, 3rd ed., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK

Hayes J., and Hsi B.P., 1975, Interrelationship between selected metrological phenomenon and immature stages of Culex pipiens, quinquefasciatus Say: study of an isolated population, 12(3): 299-308

Herrel N., Amerasinghe F.P., Ensink J., Mukhtar M., Hoek W.V.D., and Konradsen F., 2004, Adult anopheline ecology and malaria transmission in irrigated areas of South Punjab, Pakistan, Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 18(2): 141-152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00481.x PMid:15189239

Hopp M.J., and Foley J.A., 2001, Global-Scale relationship between climate and the dengue fever vector, Aedes aegypti, Climatic Change, 48(2-3): 441-463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010717502442 
 
Jackson B.T., 2004, Oviposition preferences for Infusion-Baited traps and seasonal abundance of Culex mosquitoes in South western Virginia, Blacksburg, Virginia

Jahan N., and Hussian N., 2011, Susceptibility of laboratory reader Anopheles stephensi and field collected Culex quinquefasciatus larvae to Bacillus thuringenisis serover, israelenisis and Bacillus sphaericus in Lahore, Pakistan, Pakistan Journel of Zoology, 43: 915-919

Mehravaran A., Vatandoost H., Oshaghi M.A., Abai M.R., Edalat H., Javadian E., Mashayekhi M., Piazak N., and Hanafi-Bojd A.A., 2012, Ecology of Anopheles stephensi in a malarious area, southeast of Iran, Acta Medica Iranica, 50(1): 61-65.
PMid:22267381

Kanojia P.C., Shetty P.S., and Geevarghese G., 2003, A long-term study on vector abundance & seasonal prevalencein relation to the occurrence of Japanese encephalitisin Gorakhpur district, Uttar Pradesh, The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 1: 104-110

Kern W.H., ed., 2007, Some small native freshwater fish recommended for mosquito and midge control in ornamental ponds, Electronic Data Sourece Information, University of Florida

Khan A.F., ed., 2011, Dingi (Dengue) fever in Lahore, Lahore Nama

Klinkenberg E., Konradsen F., Herrel N., Mukhtar M., van der Hoekb W., and Amerasinghe F.P., 2004, Malaria vectors in the changing environment of the southern Punjab, Pakistan, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 98(7): 442-449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.11.007  PMid:15138083

Lima C.A., Almeida W.R., Hurd H. and Albuquerque C.M., 2003, Reproductive aspects of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) infected with Wuchereria bancrofti (Spirurida: Onchocercidae), Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 98(2): 217-222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762003000200009 
 
Maitre-Pierre C., 2006, Le mosquito qui vous rend dengue, Le Journel de Mariotti, 9: 522-530

Martens P., Kovats R.S., Nijhof S., Vriesa D.P., Livermore J.T.M., Bradleyd J.D., Coxd J., and McMichael J.A., 1999, Climate change and future populations at risk of malaria, Global Environmental Change, 9: 89-107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00020-5 
 
Mehravaran A., Vatandoost H., Oshaghi M.A., Abai R.M., Edaalat H., Javadian E., Mashayekhi M., Piazak N., and Hanafi-Bojd A.A., 2011, Ecology of Anopheles stephensi in a malarious area, southeast of Iran, Acta Medica Iranica, 50(1): 61-65

Murty U.S., Sai K.S., Kumar D.V., Sriram K., Rao K.M., Krishna D., and Murty B.S., 2002, Relative abundance of Culex quinquefsciatus with reference to infection and infectivity rate from the rural and urban areas of east and west Godavari district of Andhra Perdesh, India, Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 33(4): 702-710
PMid:12757213

Poncon N., Toty C., L’Ambert G., le’Goff G., Brengues C., Schaffner F., and Fontenille D., 2007, Population dynamics of pest mosquitoes and potential malaria and west nile virus vectors in relation to climatic factors and human activities in Camargue, France, Medical and Veternary Entomology, 21(4): 350-357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00701.x PMid:18092973

Preechaporn W., Jaroensutasinee M., and Jaroensutasinee K., 2007, Seasonal prevalence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in three topographical areas of southern Thailand, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 36: 23-26

Qasim M., 2012, With estimated burden of 1.6 million malaria cases annually, Pakistan finds itself in Group-3 countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region, contributing 95 per cent of the regional malaria burden,The NEWS

Reisen W.K., Mahmood F., Parveen T., 1982, Seasonal trends in population size and survivorship of Anopheles culicifacies, An. Stephensi and An. Subpictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in rural Punjab province, Pakistan, Journal of Medical Entomology, 19(1): 86-97
PMid:7120300

Rowland M., Mahmood P., Iqbal J., Carneiro, I., and Chavasse D., 2000, Indoor residual spraying with alphacypermethrin controls malaria in Pakistan: a community-randomized trial, Tropical Medicine International Health, 5(7): 472-481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00581.x PMid:10964269

Sharma R.S., Kaul S.M., and Sokhay J., 2005, Seasonal fluctuations of dengue fever vector, Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidea) in Delhi, India, Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 36(1): 186-190
PMid:15906665

Tahir M.H, Butt A., and Khan Y.S., 2009, Response of Culex quinquefasciatus to deltamethrin in Lahore district, Journal of Parasitology and Vector Biology, 1(3): 19-24

Turell M.J., O’Guinn M.L., Dohm D.J., and Jones J.W., 2001, Vector competence of North American mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) for West Nile virus, Journal of Medical Entomology, 38(2): 130-134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-38.2.130 
 
Vujic A., Stefanovic A., Dragicevic I., Metijevic T., Pejcic L., Knezevic M., Krasic D., and Veselic S., 2010, Species composition and seasonal dynamics of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidea) in flooded areas of Vojvodina, Serbia, Archives of Biological Sciences, 62(4) :1193-1206
http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/ABS1004193V 
 
Wegbreit J., and Reisen W.K., 2000, Relationships among weather, mosquito abundance, and encephalitis virus activity in California: Kern County, J. AM. Mosq. Control Assoc., 16(1): 22-27
PMid:10757487

Whitecombe E., 2012, Indo-Gangetic river systems, monsoon and malaria, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 370(1966): 2216-2239

WHO, 2002, Dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever in Ecuador

WHO, 2005, Lymphatic filariasis

 

Journal of Mosquito Research
• Volume 3
View Options
. PDF(188KB)
. FPDF(win)
. HTML
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Farkhanda Manzoor
. Aniqa Nasir
. Sabiha Fazal
Related articles
. Mosquito
. Aedes aegypti
. Culex quinquefasciatus
. Anopheles stephensi
. Anopheles subpictus
. Population dynamics
. Bamboo traps
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment